Antagonistic organisms and Chitoplant® in the treatment of the seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. against Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present work was carried out in the Basic Unit of Cooperative Production (UBPC) “Roberto Rodríguez” located on highway Camajuaní Km 5 1/2, Villa Clara, in a brown sialitic carbonate soil, with the objective of looking for alternatives to reduce the negative impact of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. on the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The effectiveness of natural and biological products was evaluated, as well as the effect of the treatments on the morphophysiology of the crop. Seeds were treated with one of: Trichoderma viride Raifi, Bacillus subtilis Cohn, Burkholderia cepacia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Migula, Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula, or Chitoplant ® (Quitosana at 0.1%). Products were applied to the seed by immersion. Control treatments included a water control and a chemical control; TMTD WP (tetrametiltiuramdisulfuro 80%), both applied by immersion. The results obtained were that: the treatments with the bacteria and Chitoplant significantly reduced damage caused by S. rolfsii in comparison with the water and chemical controls and T. viride. All natural treatments with the exception of Chitoplant stimulated the growth and development of the crop. Seed treatment with biological products and natural substances can be used as an alternative for the reduction of S. rolfsii that cause losses in crops of the common bean.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
How to Cite
References
Butt, T.M; Raíz, J. G. y Powell, K. A (1999): Microbial biopesticides: The European scene. En: Biopesticides. Use and delivery”. F. R Hill &J. J. Menn (Eds.) Humana Press: 23-24.
Deacon J (2006): Fungal interaction: mechanisms and practical exploitation. In: Fungal Biology- 4th ed.
Fajardo, Clara Elena. (2008): Alternativas de control de hongos fitopatógenos del suelo en el cultivo del frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) TGC; Msc. en Agricultura Sostenible (CA) 55h.
Ferreira, J. H; Mather, F. Y Tomas, A. C. (1991): Biological control of Eutipa lata grapevine by and antagonistic strain of Bacillus subtilis, Phytopathology. 81:283- 287.
Gonzáles Martínez, Disley (2007): Microflora patogénica en semillas de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris) y habichuela (Vigna unguiculata sesquipedalis), su efecto en la germinación, y su control. Trabajo de diploma en opción al titulo de Ingeniero agrónomo. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias. UCLV.
Hernández, L. y Montiel, A. (2003): Microorganismos que benefician a las plantas: las bacterias PGPR. Revista de divulgación científico tecnológica de la Universidad de Veracruz. 16(1).
Lacha, G. S; Singh, R. P. Y Verna, J. P. (1996): Role of growth promoting Plants. Cerials, Pulses, Oildseeds and crops. Int'I Book and Periodical, New Delhi, India, 2:233-241.
Leifert, C; Morris, C. E. y Waites, W. M. (1994): Ecology of microbial saprophytes and pathogen im tissue culture and field- growth plants: reason for contamination problems in vitro. Critical review in plant sciences, 13(2): 139-183.
Armanfo, J; Rosas, U; Ramírez, C; Ulloa, B. E. (2011): El frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris): su importancia nutricional y como fuente de fitoquímicos. Revista Fuente, 3(8): 1-5.
Miguel, A; torres, L. A; Bonilla, Tania y Amat, Zenaida. (2000): Estudios de biocontrol in vitro del hongo fitopatógenos Sarocladium orysae con cepas de Bacillus subtilis. Fitosanidad un enfoque actual de la sanidad vegetal. Vol. (4), 34:65 – 68.
MINAGRI. (2007): Listado Oficial de Variedades Comerciales.
Sharman, V. K. Nowark, J. (1998): Verticillum wilt supresión in tomato wilt Pseudomonas bacterium. Can. J. Microbial.
Villa, Pilar; Días de Villegas, María Elena; Stefanova, Marusia y Michelena, Gergina. (2001): Proceso biotecnológico para la producción de un fungicida a partir de Pseudomonas sp. Cepa PSS, con fines fitosanitarios. RAAA, Lima, Perú: 65 – 74.