Molecular markers applied to the management of the genebank
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of molecular markers technology is more frequently applied to the GeneBanks management. Those tools detect the singularity of a source of genetic variation into and between accessions without the environmental influence, which facilitates the biodiversity characterization process, detections of duplicates, validity the genetic identity of the preserved materials, support the effectively of breeding programs and the conservations strategies as well as facilitates the seed management. However, the molecular markers technology still long away for some institutions because it requires advanced installations, qualified technical staff and its implementation could be expensive. This work pretends to updating about the routinely use of molecular markers into GeneBanks management.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms of the License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0):
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The journal is not responsible for the opinions and concepts expressed in the works, they are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the assistance of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request advisable or necessary modifications. They are accepted to publish original scientific papers, research results of interest that have not been published or sent to another journal for the same purpose.
The mention of trademarks of equipment, instruments or specific materials is for identification purposes, and there is no promotional commitment in relation to them, neither by the authors nor by the publisher.
How to Cite
References
Barbau-Piednoir, E.; Stragier, P.; Roosens, N.; Mazzara, M.; Savini, C.; Van den Eede, G. y Van den Bulcke, M. (2014). Inter-laboratory testing of GMO detection by combinatory SYBR®Green PCR screening (CoSYPS). Food Anal. Methods, 7:1719–1728.
Bassi, F. M.; Bentley, A.R.; Charmet, G.; Ortiz, R. y Crossa, J. (2015). Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.). Plant Science, 1–14. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.0 21.
Börner, A.; Kkhlestkina, E.; Chebotar, S.; Nagel, M.; Rehman Arif, B.; Neumann, M. A.; Kobiljski, K.; Lohwasser, M. y Sröder, U. (2012). Molecular markers in management of ex-situ PGR – A case study. J. Biosci., 37: 871–77. doi:10.1007/s12038-012-9250-2. www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci Published.
Cejas, I.; Méndez, R.; Villalobos, A.; Aragón, C.; Engelmann, F.; Carputo, D.; Aversano, R.; Edel Martínez, M. y Lorenzo, J. C. (2013). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris plants from non- cryopreserved and cryopreserved seeds. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4: 844–49. www.scirp.org/journal/ajps
CITMA (2016). Cuba: metas nacionales para la diversidad biológica 2016-2020, 31 pp.
Clarke, J.; Wu, H.C.; Jayasinghe, L.; Patel, A.; Reid, S. y Bayley, H. (2009). Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat. Nanotechnol., 4, 265–270.
Crossa, J.; Jarquín, D.; Franco, J.; Pérez- Rodríguez, P.; Burgueño, J.; Saint-Pierre, C.; and Vikram P. (2016). Genomic prediction of Gene Bank wheat landraces. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, 6: 1819–34. doi:10.1534/g3.116.029637.
Ellis, D.; Chavez, O.; Coombs, J.; Soto, J.; Gomez, R.; Douches, D.; Panta, A.; Silvestre, R. y Anglin, N.L. (2018). Genetic identity in genebanks: application of the SolCAP 12K array fingerprinting and diversity analysis in the global in trust potato collection. Genome, 61:523-537.
FAO (2014). Normas para bancos de germoplasma de recursos fitogenéticos para la alimentación y la agricultura. Edición revisada. Roma; 182 pp, ISBN 978-92-5- 308262-9.
Fu, Yong-bi; Ahmed, Z. y Diederichsen, A. (2015). Towards a better monitoring of seed ageing under ex-situ seed conservation. Conserv. Physiol., 3: 1–16.
Gioia, T.; Logozzo, G.; Attene, G.; Bellucci, E.; Benedettelli, S.; Papa, R. y Spagnoletti, P. (2013). Evidence for introduction bottleneck and extensive inter-gene pool (Mesoamerica X Andes) hybridization in the European common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm. PloS ONE 8 (10): e75974. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075974.
Govindaraj, M.; Vetriventhan, M. y Srinivasan, M. (2015). Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics Research International, 14 pp.
Joshi, B. K. (2017): Biotechnology for conservation and utilization of agricultural plant genetic resources in Nepal. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council, 3: 49–59.
Kamle, S. y Ali, Sh. (2013). Genetically modified crops: Detection strategies and biosafety issues. Gene, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.107. Mishra, K. K.; Fougat, R. S.; Ballani, A.; Thakur, V.; Yachana, J. y Madhumati, B. (2014). Potential and application of molecular markers techniques for plant genome analysis. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 2 (1): 169-188. ISSN: 2320 – 7051.
Mondini, L.; Noorani, A. y Pagnotta, M.A. (2009). Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity, 1, 19-35. ISSN 1424-2818.
Nadeem, M.A.; Nawaz, M.A.; Qasim, M.; Doğan, Y.; Comertpay, G.; Yıldız, M. y Hatipoğlu, R. (2018). DNA molecular markers in plant breeding: current status and recent advancements in genomic selection and genome editing. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 32 (2): 261–85. doi:10.1080/13102818.2017.1400401.
Omondi, E. O.; Debener, T.; Linde, M.; Abukutsa- Onyango, M.; Dinssa, F.F. y Winkelmann, T. (2016). Molecular Markers for Genetic Diversity Studies in African Leafy Vegetables. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 7, 188-197.
Ozsolak, F.; Platt, A.R.; Jones, D.R.; Reifenberger, J.G.; Sass, L.E.; McInerney, P.; Thompson, J.F.; Bowers, J.; Jarosz, M. y Milos, P.M. (2009). Direct RNA sequencing. Nature, 461: 814-818.
Spooner, D.; Van Treuren, R. y Vicente, de M.C. (2005). Molecular markers for Gene bank management. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No.10. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.136 pp.
Van Treuren, R. van y van Hintum, T.J.L. (2014). Next-generation genebanking: plant genetic resources management and utilization in the sequencing era. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 12(3): 298-307. ISSN 1479-2621.
Wambugu, P.W.; Ndjiondjop, M.-N. y Henry, R.J. (2018). Role of Genomics in Promoting the Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources in Genebanks. Briefings in Functional Genomics, 1–9. doi:10.1093/bfgp/ely014.
Whitlock, R.; Hipperson, H.; Thompson, D.B.A.; Butlin, R.K. y Burke, T. (2016). Consequences of in-situ strategies for the conservation of plant genetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 203: 134-142.