Effect of the application de biofertilizantes like feasible alternative in the production de margulies in fruit-bearing and ornamental species

Main Article Content

Marisel Ortega García
Ignacio Caraballo Barreto
Yoania Rios Rocafull
Bernardo Dibut Álvarez
Ulises Socas Estrada
Grisel Tejeda González

Abstract

In the work the results are shown obtained for the first time with the use of the bacterial biofertilizante with the help of Azotobacter chroococcum and Bacillus megatherium, compared with the application of the BAIFOLAM Forte cared product that it is used as stimulated and enraizer of plants. For the growth of the microorganisms a rotational shaker was used 200 r.p.m agitation and 320 C of temperature, amid cultivation DIMARGON-M, by means of submerged fermentation the one that reached a final concentration of 1013. UFC.ml-1. The objective of the present work was to demonstrate the incidence that exercises the application of the biofertilizante in Margulies of such fruit-bearing cultivations as creole lemon (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle var. Mexican), sour orange (Citrus aurantium) and guava (Psidium guajaba, Lin). and of ornamental plants Phicus golden King and Schefflera actinophilla. The used biofertilizante produces changes via xilem that are metabolized by the floem, for what the microorganisms cause they can express a marked stimulated effect in the development of the roots. The work has economic effect since it allows to substitute the BAIFOLAM Forte that has a cost 4.73 times adult that with the use of this production biofertilizante national. Always allows carrying out feasible modifications to the Margulies technology with more ecological focus.

Article Details

How to Cite
Effect of the application de biofertilizantes like feasible alternative in the production de margulies in fruit-bearing and ornamental species. (2017). Agrotecnia De Cuba, 41(2), 83-90. https://agrotecnia.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/agrotecnia/article/view/204
Section
Original Articles

How to Cite

Effect of the application de biofertilizantes like feasible alternative in the production de margulies in fruit-bearing and ornamental species. (2017). Agrotecnia De Cuba, 41(2), 83-90. https://agrotecnia.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/agrotecnia/article/view/204

References

BIOCEN. Manual de Medios de Cultivo. La Habana. Centro Nacional de Biopreparados. BIOCEN, 2011.

Biu, H; Hsiung, E.H, Kwok, T.H and Ting, W, H Microorganisms, microbial phosphate fertilizers and methods for preparing such microbial phosphate fertilizers. Patente No WO2009070966 (A1), 2009.

Cañizares Zayas J La propagación de las plantas por vía agámica, Segunda Edición Revisada en la Habana. 129 pp, 1996.

Dibut, B., Martínez. R., Ríos. Y y Ortega, M. DIMARGON-M, nueva variante nutritiva para la producción de biofertilizantes y bioestimuladores a base de Azotobacter. En: Resúmenes del V Encuentro de Agricultura Orgánica, La Habana, 36pp, 2003.

Dominíc M. E y Benítez B Uso de biopreparados como promotores de enraizamiento en margullos ficus (Ficus benjamina). Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal Scientific Information System. Cultivos Tropicales. Volumen 25, número 3, 48 49 pp, 2004.

Hayashi M, Saeki Y, Haga M, Harada K, Kouchi H, Umehara Y.R j(rj) gene involved in nitrogen- fixing root nodule formation in soybean.Breed. Sci. 61:544 –553. 2012,

Hidrobo Luna J.R. Utilización del Azotobacter en la callogénesis del Maíz (Zea mayz L.). En Memorias de de XXIV Reunión Latinoamericana de Rhizobiología (XXIV RELAR) y I Conferencia Iberoamericana de Interacciones Beneficiosas Microorganismos Planta Ambiente (I IBEMPA) La Habana, 158pp, 2009.

Garbeva, P, van Elsas. J.D and J.A van Veen. Rhizosphere microbial conmunity and response to plant spices and Soil History. Plant Soil 302: 19-32, 2008.

Inaba S, Ikenishi F, Itakura M, Kikuchi M, Eda S, Chiba N, KatsumataC, Suwa Y, Mitsui H, Minamisawa K. N2O emission from degradedsoybean nodules depends on denitrification by Bradyrhizobiumjaponicumand other microbes in the rhizosphere. MicrobesEnviron. 27:470–476, 2012.

Madigan, M., J. Martinco., D. Stahl y Clarck, D. Brock Biology of Microorganisms. Thirteenth Edition. ISBN 13: 978-8-321-64963-8. 1155 pp, 2012.

Malusa, E.; Sas-Paszt, l.; Popinska, W.; Zurawicz, E. The Effect of a Substrate Containing ArbuscularMycorrhizal fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms (Trichoderma, Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Streptomyces) and foliar fertilization on growth response and rhizosphere pH of three strawberry cultivars. Internal J. Fruit Sci. 6(4):25-41, 2007.

Martínez, R., López. M., Dibut, B., Parra, C y Rodríguez, J. La fijación biológica de nitrógeno atmosférico en condiciones tropicales. Venezuela. MPPAT. 172 pp, 2007.

Martínez, R y Dibut, B. Biofertilizantes Bacterianos. Editorial Científico-Técnica. Instituto Cubano del Libro. ISBN 978-959-05-0659-8. 279 pp. Universidad Agraria de la Habana. La Habana, Cuba, 2012.

Nakagawa T. From defense to symbiosis: Limited alterations in the kinasedomain of LysM receptor-like kinases are crucial for evolution of legume–Rhizobiumsymbiosis. Plant J 65(2):169–180, 2011.

Ortega García. M. Efecto del biopreparado Multipropósito AZOMEG en el cultivo de la rosa. En Memorias de XXIV Reunión Latinoamericana de Rhizobiología (XXIV RELAR) y I Conferencia Iberoamericana de Interacciones Beneficiosas Microorganismos Planta Ambiente (I IBEMPA) La Habana, 222pp, 2009.

Rinaudi, L. V., and Giordano, W. Anintegratedview of biofilm formationin rhizobia. FEMS (Fed. Eur. Microbiol. Soc.) Microbiol. Lett.304:1-11, 2010.

Sasson, A. La contribución de las biotecnologías a la alimentación. Biotecnología Aplicada. Vol. 17, No. 1: 2-6, 2000.

Smith SE, Smith FA. Roles of in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62: 227– 250, 2011.

Wagg C, Jansa J, Stadler M, Schmid B, van der Heijden MGA. Mycorrhizal fungal identity and diversity relaxes plant-plant competition. Ecology 92: 1303–1313, 2011.