Evaluation the quality the different organic substrates in condition of the organoponic

Main Article Content

Maite Torres Leblanch
Rosa del Carmen Orellana Gallego
Julio Rodríguez Martínez
Amarilis Cruz Ortega
Maritza Díaz López

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate physical, chemical, and biological indicators in three organoponics before and after two successive crops. A complete randomized block designs with three replicates. The response variables were pH, electric conductivity, total nitrogen, organic matter, relationship carbon/nitrogen, microbial breathing, natural and hygroscopic moisture, bulk and real densities, total porosity. The half arithmetic and standard error of were determinates. They were bivariate correlations and diagrams of the degradation indicators. To the beginning the substrates showed porosities and densities bulk (bigger to 68.8 % to 0.81 mg.m-3, respectively). Those that were relate significantly to each other and with the humidity. The management of the substrates in the organoponic was determinate in more or smaller degree the heterogeneity of these. The chemical characterization demonstrated the drop homogeneity of the same ones during the preparation of the containers, what rebounded in its physical properties. By means of the polynomial curves of third order, for each organoponic, it was possible to define the range porosity to which the indicators behaved better for benefit of the substrate. The microbial breathing became more effective to 60 mg CO2 when the volume of pores was the 70 - 74 % and the content of carbon oscillated among 4 to 8 %. It was evidence in all the cases the highly significant relationship that exists between the porous state and the indicators of degradation of the organic matter.

Article Details

How to Cite
Evaluation the quality the different organic substrates in condition of the organoponic. (2023). Agrotecnia De Cuba, 47(2), 54-67. https://agrotecnia.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/agrotecnia/article/view/29
Section
Original Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation the quality the different organic substrates in condition of the organoponic. (2023). Agrotecnia De Cuba, 47(2), 54-67. https://agrotecnia.edicionescervantes.com/index.php/agrotecnia/article/view/29

References

Aira, M.; Pérez-Losada, M. y Domínguez, J. (2018). Diversity, structure and sources of bacterial communities in earthworm cocoons. Scientific Reports, 8 (1) 6632. DOI. 10.1038/s41598-018-25081-9

Arango, M.J.O. (2017). Abonos orgánicos como alternativa para la conservación y mejoramiento de los Suelos. Trabajo de grado para optar por el título de Especialista en Gerencia Agropecuaria. Corporación Universitaria Lasallista. Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Agropecuarias. Especialización en Gerencia Agropecuaria Caldas – Antioquia. Disponible en: http.//repository.lasallista.edu.co/dspace/bit stream/10567/2036/1

Bárbaro, L.; Karlanian, M.; Rizzo, P. y Riera, N. (2019). Caracterización de diferentes compost para su uso como componente de sustrato. Chilean Journal of Agricultural and Animal Science, 35:126-136. Disponible en: https.//doi.org/0.4067/S0719- 38902019005000309

Dickson, R.W.; Jackson, B.E y Machesney, L.M. (2022). Evaluation of Peat Blended with Pine Wood Components for Effects on Substrate Physical Properties, Nitrogen Immobilization, and Growth of Petunia (Petunia x hybrida Vilm.-Andr.). Department of Horticulture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701. HortScience, 57(2):304-311. Disponible en: https.//doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16177- 21

García, C.; Hernández, T.; Pascual, J.; Moreno, J.L. y Ros, M. (2000). Actividad microbiana en suelos del sureste español sometidos a procesos de degradación y Desertificación. Estrategias para su rehabilitación. En: García, C. y Hernández, M.T. (eds.), Investigación y Perspectivas de la Enzimología de Suelos en España. Consejo Sup. Invest. Científicas (CSIC)- CEBAS, Murcia, España, 43-92. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php%3Fscript%3Dsci_nlinks%26ref%3D63646 31%26pid%3DS18538665201200010000700015

Gruda, N.S. (2019). Increasing sustainability of growing media constituents and stand-alone substrates in soilless culture systems. Agronomy, 9(6):1-24. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060298

Guadarrama, N.A.; Mejía, C.J y Ramírez, G.M.G. (2018). Mineralización de la materia orgánica en suelos con manejo diferencial en cultivo de rosa. Centro Universitario Tenancingo, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. 28 (2). ISSN: 2007-9621.

GNAU (2011). Manual de organopónico, huertos intensivos y organoponía semiprotegida. Asociación Cubana de Técnicos Agrícolas y Forestales. Cuba. 100 p. ISBN: 978-959- 7210-48-1

IS (1988): Laboratorio Provincial de Suelos de La Habana, 12 p.

Jilling, A.; Keiluweit, M.; Contosta, A.R.; Frey, S.; Schimel, J.; Schnecker, J.; Smith, R.G.; Tiemann, L. y Grandy, A.S. (2018). Minerals in the rhizosphere. overlooked mediators of soil nitrogen availability to plants and microbes. Biogeochemistry, 139, 103-122. Disponible en: https.//doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0459-5

Marques de Abreu, A.H.; Dos Santos, P.S.L; Amaral de Melo, L.; Rodríguez de Oliveira, R. y Ferreira, D.H.A.A. (2017). Caracterizacao e potencial de substratos formulados combiossólidos na producao de mudas de Schinus Terebinthifolius Raddi. E Androanthus heptaphyllus (Vell). Mattos. Ciencia Forestal, Santa Maria, 27(4): 1179-1190. ISSN: 0103-9954.

Monsalve, O.I.C.; Henao, M.C.T y Gutiérrez, J.S.D. (2021). Caracterización de materiales con uso potencial como sustratos en sistemas de cultivo sin suelo. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecuaria, 22 (1) e1977. Disponible en: https.//doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol22_num1_ art.1977. ISSN: 0122-8706.

Quintero, M.F.; González, M.; y Guzmán, J.M. (2011). Sustratos para cultivos hortícolas y flores de corte. En: Flórez R., V. J. (ed). Sustratos, Manejo del Clima, Automatización y Control en Sistemas de Cultivo sin Suelo. Universidad Nacional de Bogotá. Colombia, 79-108. Disponible en: https.//www.researchgate.net/publication/2 35999721_Sustratos_para_cultivos_hortico las_y_flores_de_corte.

Saath, K.C.D.O y Fachinello, A.L. (2018). Crescimento da demanda mundial de alimentos e restrições do fator terra no Brasil. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 56 (2): 195-212. Disponible en: https.//doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790560201.

Savvas, D. y Gruda, N. (2018). Application of soilless culture technologies in the modern greenhouse industry - A review. European Journal of Horticultural Science, 83 (5): 280-293. Disponible en: https.//doi.org/10.17660/eJHS.2018/83.5.2

Torres, M.; Orellana, R.; González, M.; Rodríguez, J. y Cruz, A. (2018). Efecto del uso de los residuos vegetales sobre los sustratos orgánicos. Agrotecnia de Cuba, 42 (1): 1-15. ISSN: 0568- 3114.

Vázquez, J. y Loli, O. (2018). Compost y vermicompost como enmiendas en la recuperación de un suelo degradado

por el manejo de Gypsophila paniculata. Universidad Católica de Cuenca. Scientia Agropecuaria, 9 (1). ISSN: 2077-9917.

Walkley, A. y Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29–38. ISSN: 0038-075X, 1538-9243.

Yang, Y.; Du, W.; Ren, X.; Cui, Z.; Zhou, W. y Lv, J. (2020). Effect of bean dregs amendment on the organic matter degradation, humification, maturity and stability of pig manure composting. Science of the Total Environment, 708. Disponible en:https.//doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019. 134623.